Sunday, April 19, 2015

May 2015 Visa Bulletin: Retrogression for EB-5 Visa Category for China to May 01 2013. Dependent children under 21 and CSPA issues.

In May 2015 Visa Bulletin, the US Department of State had implemented a cutoff date for EB-5, immigrant investor visa category for China
In May 2015 Bulletin, it retrogresses to May 1, 2013 (two years).



How will it affect dependent children of a primary investor? How to protect dependents from ageing-out and becoming ineligible for a visa?

On April 13, 2015, Visa Office attended IIUSA 2015 EB-5 Regional Economic Advocacy Conference and provided some guidance on application of CSPA to those derivative children:

May 2015 visa bulletin can be found here

See at Smal Immigration Law Office Blog

Wednesday, March 25, 2015

O-1B denial case: stable owners sued USCIS for denial of O-1B extension to their racehorse trainer. AAO upheld denial for "material error" in the previous approvals.

This case proves once again that O visas (visas for individuals with Extraordinary Ability or Achievement) could be tricky and sometimes unpredictable. This O-1B (extraordinary ability visa in arts) was approved and extended two times prior to subsequent denial of another extension.



A popular thoroughbred racehorse trainer has accused the USCIS in a D.C. federal court of engaging in “capricious” and “arbitrary” behavior by denying an assistant trainer an extension of his nonimmigrant worker status after previously granting it without incident.

Mott Thoroughbred Stables Inc. said in its Friday complaint that by surprisingly and abruptly denying an O-1B petition extension to an “indispensable employee” on which the famed stables has relied since he began working there in 2010, the USCIS has caused irreparable harm to Mott Stables’ multimillion-dollar horse-training business.

The complaint asks the court to compel the USCIS to set aside the petition denial and promptly re-adjudicate the petition with deference to the prior approvals. It also asks the court to order the agency to postpone the effective date of its denial of the petition for assistant horse trainer Rodolphe Brisset and grant a temporary visa status pending the outcome of the instant suit.

“The USCIS failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the denial, failed to cite relevant authority for its decision and failed to clearly articulate the reasons for its abrupt departure from past and ongoing practice of approving O-1B petitions for horse trainers,” the complaint says.

The lawsuit says the unsuccessful petition is virtually the same as the ones USCIS previously approved, and that the agency only now has decided that its past approvals were a “material error” on the part of the agency, “in contravention of internal agency guidance on deference to prior approvals.”

Petitioner also asked the court to open up limited discovery to ascertain the agency’s grounds for denying the company’s petition in light of the two previous approvals of the same petition.

Mott Stables is challenging an October 2014 decision by the USCIS Administrative Appeals Office to uphold the denial of an O-1B extension to the trainer.

After two successful approvals, in 2013 the USCIS sent Mott Stables a request for evidence ( RFE)regarding the international acclaim and recognition Brisset has received a horse trainer, according to the complaint.

Among the types of evidence Mott Stables could hand over was “comparable evidence” of Brisset’s distinction as a prominent horse trainer, and in February 2014 the company sent to the USCIS a letter signed by six expert member of the equine community attesting to Brisset’s skills, according to the complaint. Mott Stables also explained the “unique nature” of the thoroughbred racing industry and why the trainer plays “an essential and critical role” in successful training operations, the complaint says.

In March 2014, the USCIS denied the petition, saying Mott Stables hadn’t demonstrated that Brisset had extraordinary ability in the field of endeavor nor that he had sustained national or international acclaim, according to the complaint.

On appeal, Mott Stables argued that a Department of Homeland Security memo says that deference must be given to a prior determination that an individual is eligible for a particular nonimmigrant classificationwhere extension of that nonimmigrant petition’s validity “involves the same parties and the same underlying facts,” the complaint says.

Mott Stables argued that the USCIS had not explicitly said why it refused the petition and that changed circumstances and new material information — possibly dispositive developments — did not form the basis of the agency’s decision.

When the USCIS’ appellate body AAO upheld the denial, it ruled that the memo's deference order didn’t apply when there was a "material error," which in this case was that since 2010 the agency had incorrectly found that Brisset’s occupation fell within the O-1B classification, according to the complaint.

Mott Stables said in its Friday complaint that this was the first time the USCIS had ever ruled that Brisset’s horse-trainer position did not qualify as a creative activity or endeavor, such that he could have been classified as an alien of extraordinary ability in the arts.

Read at http://law-visa-usa.com/1/post/2015/03/o-1b-denial-case-stable-owners-sued-uscis-for-denial-of-o-1b-extension-to-their-racehorse-trainer-aao-upheld-denial-for-material-error-in-the-previous-approvals.html


Law360, Mar. 10, 2015.

Thursday, March 12, 2015

DERIVATIVE CITIZENSHIP CHARTS: how children born abroad to a US citizen parent acquire or derive US citizenship at birth.

DERIVATIVE CITIZENSHIP CHARTS:

How children born abroad to a US citizen mother or father acquire or derive US citizenship through their parents, their mother or father. How children used to derive US citizenship under the old laws (which is still relevant because it applies to those children who were born during those timeframes).


Please see charts on acquisition/derivation of citizenship here:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/64881744/1.CHILD_CITIZENSHIP_CHART_1_natz_chart-a-2014-11-12.pdf

Chart B:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/64881744/1.CHILD_CITIZENSHIP_CHART_2_OUT_OF_WEDLOCK_natz_chart-b-2014-11.12.pdf

Chart C: 
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/64881744/1.CHILD_CITIZENSHIP_CHART_3_natz_chart-c-2015_3-4.ak_.pdf

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Big news for H4 spouses. Effective May 26, 2015, some H-4 spouses can apply for a work permit or EAD.


Big news for H4 spouses: USCIS announced today that, effective May 26, 2015, the DHS is extending eligibility for employment authorization to certain H-4 dependent spouses of H-1B nonimmigrants who are seeking employment-based lawful permanent resident (LPR) status. DHS amended the regulations to allow these H-4 dependent spouses to accept employment in the United States. 

Eligible individuals include certain H-4 dependent spouses of H-1B nonimmigrants who: 
  • Are the principal beneficiaries of an approved Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker; or 
  • Have been granted H-1B status under sections 106(a) and (b) of the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-first Century Act of 2000 as amended by the 21st Century Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act. The Act permits H-1B nonimmigrants seeking lawful permanent residence to work and remain in the United States beyond the six-year limit on their H-1B status.
Under the new rule, eligible H-4 dependent spouses must file Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, with supporting evidence and the required $380 fee in order to obtain employment authorization and receive a Form I-766, Employment Authorization Document (EAD). USCIS will begin accepting applications on May 26, 2015. Once USCIS approves the Form I-765 and the H-4 dependent spouse receives an EAD, he or she may begin working in the United States.


Friday, January 30, 2015

Treaty Trader and Treaty Investor E-1 and E-2 visas: effective May 1, 2015, electronic visa application process at the US Consulate in Vienna, Austria.

Treaty Traders and Treaty Investors Visa E-1 and E-2 visas: new application procedures when applying at the US consulate in Vienna, Austria. Effective May 01, 2015, only electronic submissions will be accepted.

The Immigration and Nationality Act provides non-immigrant visa status for a national of a country with which the United States maintains a treaty of commerce and navigation who is coming to the United States to carry on substantial trade, including trade in services or technology, principally between the U.S. and the treaty country, or to develop and direct the operations of an enterprise in which the national has invested, or is in the process of investing a substantial amount of capital which is at risk in a commercial sense. 

TREATY TRADER (E-1) REQUIREMENTS:
  • The applicant must be a national of a treaty country;
  • The trading firm for which the applicant is coming to the U.S. must have the nationality of the treaty country. Please note that the nationality of an enterprise is determined by the nationality of the enterprise's owner(s);
  • The international trade must be "substantial." There must be a sizeable and continuing volume of trade (trade means the international exchange of goods, services, and technology). Title of the trade items must pass from one party to the other;
  • The trade of the U.S. enterprise must be principally between the U.S. and the treaty country. More than 50 percent of the international trade involved must be between the U.S. and the country of the applicant's nationality;
  • The applicant must be employed in a supervisory or executive capacity, or possess highly specialized skill essential to the efficient operation of the firm. Ordinary skilled or unskilled workers do not qualify. Please note that a detailed explanation of why the applicant's skills are essential for the enterprise in the U.S. is required.
TREATY INVESTOR (E-2) REQUIREMENTS:
  • The investor, either a real or corporate person, must be a national of the treaty country;
  • The investment must be substantial and placed "at risk" and the funds have to be "irrevocably" committed. The investment must be sufficient to ensure the successful operation of the enterprise. If the funds are not subject to partial or total loss if business fortunes reverse, then the investment is not an investment in the sense intended by the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) 101(a)(15)(E) and in 9 Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) 41.51.;
  • The investment must be in a real operating enterprise.Speculative or idle investment does not qualify. Uncommitted funds in a bank account or mere ownership of undeveloped land are not considered an investment. Payments in the form of leases or rents for property or equipment may be calculated towards the investment in an amount limited to the funds devoted to that item in any one month;
  • The investment may not be marginal. Based on 9 FAM 41.51, the enterprise must either show a financial return that significantly exceeds what is necessary to support a living for the investor or else the enterprise must have the capacity, present or future, to make a significant economic contribution;
  • The investor must have control of the funds. Loans secured with the assets of the investment enterprise are not allowed. Loans secured with personal assets are acceptable;
  • The investor must be coming to the United States to develop and direct the enterprise. If the applicant is not the principal investor, he or she must be employed in a supervisory, executive, or highly specialized skill capacity. Based on 9 FAM 41.51 Note 14.3 a detailed explanation of why the applicant's skills are "essential" for the enterprise in the United States is required or based on 9 FAM 41.51 Note 14.2 a detailed explanation of why the applicant possesses qualifying "executive or supervisory" experience.
E VISA APPLICATION PROCESSING:
  • As of May 1, 2015 electronic submission is the only acceptable method for E visa submission! Cases must be submitted to: ViennaEvisas@state.gov.
    Please use the e-mail subject line: “Surname, Given Name, Business Name, E Visa Application”. Use this email address for specific E visa questions as well as regarding E visa cases already submitted.
  • E visa package, submitted electronically, should not exceed 7MB (about 100 pages, pdf only). You may use multiple attachments. Do NOT send “linked” files, as we cannot access or open these. Please scan documents with a maximum of 300 DPI to keep file size small.
  • Between now and May 1, 2015 E visa applications may either be submitted electronically or as a printed paper version.Please limit paper versions to 100 pages and note that the review for paper versions might take longer. The mailing address for paper applications is: U.S. Embassy, Boltzmanngasse 16, A-1090 Wien, Att: Consular Section/E Visa Unit.
To begin the process to obtain your E visa, follow the instructions (step 1 and step 2) provided on our homepage at:http://austria.usembassy.gov/niv_applic.html. You may submit your E visa package only once you have completed the visa application form DS-160 and paid the application fee. 

Case review begins upon receipt of a complete application. Incomplete applications will delay processing. Should your case require additional documentation, this office will contact you or your attorney via e-mail. 

Interview scheduling: Please note that all applicants for Treaty Trader/Investor visa will only be able to schedule their appointment for the visa interview only after submitting the request and receiving the approval for appointment from the Embassy. The request can only be approved once the review has been completed. 

Formal adjudication of the case begins with the in-person interview. If, after the interview, the case should require additional documentation, you will receive clear guidance from the Consular Officer on what to submit, and by what method. 

There are three different categories of E visa submission:
  1. If this is your first E visa, and you are either applying to work as an employee for a new E visa enterprise or you yourself are the investor, you must submit following documentation: Forms DS-160 and DS-156E; the statement about your intent to return upon termination of your E status; and the full E visa documentation package. Full instructions to build an appropriate E visa package are available here:Instructions for Applying for Nonimmigrant E1/E2 Visas.
  2. If you are renewing your E visa, provide the following documentation: Forms DS-160 and DS-156E; the statement about your intent to return upon termination of your E status; a letter from your employer/the U.S. enterprise containing a detailed description of the enterprise’s past and planned activities; proof that the enterprise is still operating, such as copies of the last available U.S. corporate tax returns/updated profit and loss statement/balance sheet/W-2 forms for employees and/or payroll documentation and. Only if there has been a change in the enterprise’s ownership the new ownership documentation needs to be submitted as well.
  3. If this is your first E visa, but you are applying to work as an employee for a previously- qualified E visa enterprise, provide the following documentation: Forms DS-160 and DS-156E; the statement about your intent to return upon termination of your E status; a detailed resume or CV and documentation of your professional qualification (such as copies of education degrees, job training certificates and/or letters from previous employers); a letter of support from your prospective U.S. employer containing a detailed position description; proof that the enterprise is still operating, such as copies of the last available US tax return/updated profit and loss statement/balance sheet/W-2 forms for employees and/or payroll documentation and. Only if there has been a change in the enterprise’s ownership the new ownership documentation needs to be submitted as well.